Themoneynarrative’s interview with RHT.V’s Interim CEO, Chris Shields

On December 21, 2023, themoneynarrative had the opportunity to speak with Chris Shields, Interim CEO of Reliq Health Technologies (RHT.V).  The company has been in the news of late as a result of delayed financials and the resignation of former CEO Lisa Crossley owing to serious health issues.  The questions posed were not provided in advance.

themoneynarrative:  Tell us about your involvement with Reliq Health and where your focus is now.

Chris Shields:  I’ve been involved with Reliq since January of 2019.  I had previously worked with Lisa at Natrix Separations.  She had called me around that time and asked me if I’d be willing to join the company and help build out the US operation both from the sales side as well as any of the device acquisition, delivery to customers, and operational activities that might need to be done.  The software is delivered from our Canadian team at the start.  It was primarily sales and business development, and as we  grew in the US, having someone manage the US team.

themoneynarrative:  What are the biggest challenges faced by Reliq Health at present?

Chris Shields:  I think, as everyone knows, Dr. Crossley was  very successful in developing a product that the market needs.  We’ve been able to show by our clients that we’ve been signing that it really meets an unmet need.  The key challenge has been the relatively new market.  Most of our customers haven’t done virtual care in the past, so there can be slow moving at the start.  But then when it gets down to implementation, customers tend to be much, much slower than they expected coming out of the gate.  In healthcare, adopting a new technology and feeling comfortable that this is something that your patients will like and benefit from can be a slow process.  For some clients, it takes a couple of months, but for other clients it takes a year to 18 months before they can get their full patient roster on the program.

themoneynarrative:  Is there an expected timeline to find a permanent new CEO?

Chris Shields:  No.  Our goal is to have someone announced by June of 2024, but it’s not a hard date.  That’s our internal goal.  Adding to the US management team was already in the works because of our growth; I need to find a replacement or someone who can help to manage more of the US business first.  We’re looking at getting someone east coast and west coast now.  I think  we have big enough sales efforts that we can really get two regional business development, sales implementation people (whether they are director or VP level we’ll see based on their experience), but that’s where I’m looking to fill first, to take some of the pressure off what I’ve been doing, so that I can focus on some of these other tasks.  And then we’ll start really looking at the CEO position.

themoneynarrative:  Does the company have the staffing and expertise required to fulfill its goals?

Chris Shields:  If you look at our business model, delivering the software product and the work we do with customers on pre-authorizations, going through their patient lists and determining eligibility, that’s all done by software tools, and requires very little human resources.  There are human resources needed to upgrade and continually add new products and features to the software, but we have our internal team, as well as multiple external teams that we can grow as needed.  For instance, over the last year, year and a half, two years we’ve had a significant increase in our R&D expenses, because we’ve been adding the FHIR [Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources] standard to our software.  We’ve added quite a few resources externally and internally to help support that but, in general, on the implementation side, our software products require very little human resources.  For customer implementation and training, we have our own staff that manages those activities, and we’ve been adding to that staff as needed.  We’ve added people on the ground in Florida, especially for skilled nursing facilities and ALFs [Assisted Living Facilities].  As our recent raise indicated, we’re adding that same type of staffing in six or eight other states where we didn’t have that staffing before.  For our care management team, we rely on Cognizant to provide the majority of our staffing there, and that’s going to continue into the future.  They bring on people as needed, and we really rely on them to bring in teams, and then we train them and they continually add to the staff that’s needed so it puts less burden on us to bring in care managers as we’re growing.

themoneynarrative:  Is cash flow an issue?

Chris Shields:  I think for any small, rapidly-growing company cash flow is always something that needs to be actively managed.  Managing your incoming cash with what goes out is never a straight line.  So there’ll always be points of time in a month or months in general that there may be a mismatch and so it’s important for us to manage it as we’re growing, because we always want to make sure we have enough cash going forward to meet the growth needs of our large clients.

themoneynarrative:  Are the following objectives being met, and, if not, what is being done?

  • patient onboarding
  • support to achieve patient adherence
  • payment to Reliq

Chris Shields:  I think we set pretty high goals for ourselves, so we’re never going to be satisfied with results because we want to move these things along as fast as possible and achieve the next milestone.  I think it’s important that we bring the best care to customers as our primary mission.  Obviously, bringing in revenue and showing the company has value so that shareholders benefit is right up there with providing patients with great care.  At the beginning of the year, we really focused on understanding and improving adherence and, where we have taken over adherence, we’ve really been able to show that we can get to that 70% adherence rate and, in some cases, it’s even higher.  We expect that to be the case across the board over time.  I’m not going to put a date on when I think we’ll get across the board 70% adherence.  We’ll give indications going forward of where we are in our progress.  For anyone who may not believe that’s achievable, I think over the next year we’ll be able to show the progress that we’ve made in calendar 2023 as revenue begins to align with patient onboarding numbers and adherence rates.  There is always going to be some time from implementation, to getting patient’s adherent, to billing, to collection.  So there may be some delays that people perceive, but we are on track for all of our plans.

themoneynarrative:  Investor communications are often problematic for early-stage issuers.  Do you have any thoughts on this topic?

Chris Shields:  I think we run into that.  Most companies at our stage are not publicly traded.  I’ve worked for a number of small, early-stage companies and the difficulties that Reliq has had over the past few years wouldn’t even be significant issues for a VC-backed company or a privately-held company because of the growth rate we’ve seen in adding new large US healthcare clients and adding new customers and adding new technology, but even long-standing companies complain about the quarter-to-quarter measurements and slight misses that really can impact them, and it’s magnified significantly for a company that’s not going to have straight-line growth.  There will be ups and downs.  Revenue collection may not be linear, as we are growing and building up staff.  If we look at where Reliq has been, our focus was, developing the technology, creating market pull, getting large US healthcare customers interested in the services – we hadn’t really focused until this year on adding dedicated staff for activities like dedicated collections, or as you can see from this year, and partially from last year, we had an accounting team, but we really didn’t have a team that was focused on preparing for the audit.  We just took people from their regular jobs and for three months they did double duty.  The biggest challenge for us as a small company: being able to build out all of those support services that aren’t directly related to our mission of building a company that has a great product, great customers, and really has dominated the market that we’re in.  And so we’ve seen that we’ve done a great job at those first three things and we really now need to spend time in the next year or two building out all the support services to make us a well-rounded, better-functioning company.

themoneynarrative:  Do you have any other thoughts you would like to share?

Chris Shields:  I know the ride so far and being an investor with Reliq has been challenging, but I think the fundamentals of the company remain the same.  Over the long term people will see that value.  It may not be quarter to quarter or even year to year, but if you look back at where we’ve been trending, we’re still on the same trajectory we’ve always forecasted, it’s just taken us longer to get there.  We expect to get to our  milestone of 100 million in revenue.  We’re still on that track.  It just may take us longer than we first anticipated to get there.

69 thoughts on “Themoneynarrative’s interview with RHT.V’s Interim CEO, Chris Shields

  1. Let’s relax. It was a trade for 2000 shares or 500$

    This doesn’t indicate any positive news or change many folks fraud accusations

    The company has 220m float. Let’s keep it all in perspective.

    Themoneynarrative replies (12:50 PM): We agree that it doesn’t tell us a lot; however, it is curious that, even with small trading volumes, there are investors who are prepared to pay more than the CTO price of $0.215 (Canadian). Our observation was simply that some parties are prepared to pay a higher price. Our due diligence (totally distinct from the OTC trading) suggests that the situation is not nearly as dire as some parties are stating publicly, and by their own admissions they have no new information upon which to base their opinions. RHT.V Interim CEO Chris Shields will be speaking at 3:00 PM ET today at the M-Vest event, so stay tuned. Any suggestion that fraud is being committed is completely scurrilous and unsupported. We are aware of legal action being taken by other issuers against investor web site participants who have made such libelous remarks. The “anonymity” that the public sees does not protect users from scrutiny by defamed parties.

    Like

  2. RQHTF (RHT.V OTC) last traded this morning (January 24, 2024) at US$0.25 (approximately $0.3370 Canadian). We believe that upcoming news is going to offset rock-bottom investor expectations.

    Like

  3. Is it interesting enough though to make a comment?
    Once the price reaches $0.001 and there is a trade at $0.002 will you run around screaming ‘Look, it is 100% up! Somebody knows something! We were right!’
    The company is straight up disrespectful towards the retail shareholders, who were the only ones funding their salaries and keeping their lights on through dilution in the past 5 years. The lack of updates and information, implementation of CTO, failure to issue earnings 7 months after the end of the period being reported is ridiculous. Is there a single actual customer that can come out and say ‘Hi, I work in this organization, I use the product, I like it, and I am actually paying for it’. After 9 years of existence and 7 years after company announced it is cash flow positive – there is none

    Themoneynarrative replies (6:09 PM): Absolutely – a company subject to a CTO trading higher than the last-traded price (before the CTO) is always news! If this reaches $0.001 we will no longer be covering it. What is interesting is the large price movement (both down and up), and the expectation that Interim CEO Chris Shields will be presenting at a couple of investor conferences in the next few days. Annoyance is understandable, but investing is best accomplished by setting emotions aside. Investors who are very upset with unexpected negative outcomes generally are invested in the wrong place, since their risk tolerance is lower than they believe, as revealed by their reaction. Look away for now, and wait for facts to be revealed. Facts will move the price one way or another, and more reasoned decisions can be made.

    Like

  4. Smoke and mirrors. A total of 500k shares have traded for this stock to move back around the sun. Big deal it’s at 16. Could drop back to 10 tomorrow. There is still no word from the company and no realistic way for CANADIAN investors to openly and freely trade the stock. It is frustrating to see your money go up in smoke around you without being able to do anything

    Themoneynarrative replies (3:48 PM): Investors have every reason to be concerned, particularly since RHT.V has not provided updates to clarify the situation (for better or for worse). That being said, it is certainly very intriguing that investors were prepared to pay as much as US$0.1962 OTC (approximately $0.2642 Canadian) earlier this afternoon (January 23, 2024), a price well above the $0.215 (Canadian) when the CTO came into effect, particularly when other investors were prepared to sell this morning at US$0.0993 (about half the price) – ouch!

    Like

  5. RQHTF (RHT.V OTC) is doing well this afternoon (January 23, 2024) so far, with the price moving up to US$0.16 on the biggest trade of the day, which puts it right back up to the CTO $0.215 price (Canadian dollars) on the TSX Venture Exchange. Do some parties know something is in the works? Looking at investor chat sites, we can’t help but note how ridiculous some of the comments are. Interim CEO Chris Shields has no presence on LinkedIn (as claimed by one poster)? Nonsense, we found it easily. Investors beware of bogus information.

    Like

  6. Traders with a very high risk tolerance and able to do so through their brokerage might trade RQHTF (RHT.V OTC). While trading volumes are low, price volatility is high, the stock having rebounded from yesterday’s close of US$0.0945 to US$0.138731 around midday today (January 23, 2024) before settling back at US$0.1244.

    Like

  7. Previous CEO smoke us out with Nasdaq listing for years, what is the logic not to have upgrade listing on TSX first, but not sure dream team fan of resulting increase regulation (enlarge board, reporting, …) as so disrespectful to investors. To some extend real owners are retails investors who could potentially team to request a general assembly with 5% of shares but more easy to say than to perform

    Listing on Nasdaq means higher risk of class action in US, clearly not an organisation with the skill to affront such turmoil

    Themoneynarrative replies (9:58 AM): Listing on a particular exchange has numerous pros and cons. The potential advantages include broader market exposure to retail and institutional investors, bankers, analysts, investment promoters, prospective clients and business partners, with enhanced corporate status. Trading volumes can be significantly higher, with the potential of stock appreciation and greater ease and positive outcomes of financings, using a wider range of financial instruments. Cons include much more rigorous listing requirements, both initially and on an ongoing basis, as well as the significant cost of listing on a more senior exchange. Some issuers discover that the increased attention of a senior exchange can also bring added negative attention and a magnified declining stock price when circumstances become unfavourable. Typically a corporation will favour the additional market exposure in the U.S. of listing on Nasdaq as opposed to upgrading to the TSX when making this choice.

    Like

  8. Thank you again for providing the insight you have gleamed from your research into reliq. We’ve been holding for nearly as long as when your first started to publish your findings into reliq. As we’re not hearing much from the company, can you share what this means that reliq is no longer part of the venture composite? Do I understand correctly this doesn’t mean it’s delisted and that when the cto is lifted, trading will resume in the venture exchange under rht? Any other thoughts for investors trying to understand this latest development and what it may mean?

    Themoneynarrative replies (9:29 AM): There seems to be a lot of confusion out there among other investors. We could speak at great length regarding the various regulatory and other entities and the actions taken with respect to issuers in default or no longer qualifying, but the simple answer is that different entities impose different restrictions and have varying requirements for reinstatement of privileges to occur. The entities in question include securities commissions and exchanges. There are also market participants such as S&P Global, a company widely known for indices, market data and credit ratings. In brief, RHT.V must release its delayed financial statements before the existing Cease Trade Order (which applies across Canadian reciprocal order jurisdictions automatically) is lifted by the British Columbia Securities Commission. There will be a delay after filing of the financials before lifting of the CTO to enable the market to review the materials. The TSX Venture Exchange’s requirements will also have to be met for trading to resume there. As far as the S&P/TSX Venture Composite Index is concerned, inclusion or exclusion of an issuer from the index, in the absence of trading restrictions imposed by a securities commission or exchange, will not impact the issuer’s trading, although the issuer’s stock price and trading volume can be impacted as discussed in a prior comment. The TMX Group and other entities also publish various indices, so investors need to be careful about what is being referred to. Investors can find (accurate) information from each regulator or other entity’s website, so it is best not to believe investor chat site pronouncements without verifying the source.

    Like

  9. The index includes about 500 companies, weighted by market capitalization. It is revised quarterly to remove companies which have a weight of less than 0.05% of the index, and to include companies which, if included, would have a weight of more than 0.05%

    Themoneynarrative replies (8:47 PM): The S&P/TSX Venture Composite Index is composed of 135 constituents. Investors can review their institutional fact sheet and methodology here: S&P/TSX Venture Composite Index Fact Sheet and S&P/TSX Venture Composite Index Methodology.

    Like

  10. What are the implications of the fact that Reliq was just dropped from the venture index today? And how is it possible that these clowns can’t even type up a response to being placed on a CTO?

    Themoneynarrative replies (6:45 PM, edited 9:18 PM): The inclusion or exclusion of stocks in the index in question is a defined process. If RHT.V no longer qualified, it would be removed. The impact would not be particularly important, although stocks are supported by entities investing in the basket of securities represented in the index. Since RHT.V does not have a large institutional shareholding, the impact of any removal from the index would be less impactful than might otherwise be the case. As for a press release regarding recent events, our understanding is that it is imminent, although in our view announcements should have been made regularly over the past number of weeks to keep investors properly informed.

    Like

  11. Any word on why the stock dropped so precipitously today? I don’t see any news.

    Themoneynarrative replies (6:34 PM): As quoted on January 16, 2024 (9:17 PM) from the Cease Trade Order, “Despite this order, a beneficial securityholder of the Issuer who is not, and was not at the date of this order, an insider or control person of the Issuer, may sell securities of the Issuer acquired before the date of this order if both of the following apply: 1. the sale is made through a ‘foreign organized regulated market’, as defined in section 1.1 of the Universal Market Integrity Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada; and 2. the sale is made through an investment dealer registered in a jurisdiction of Canada in accordance with applicable securities legislation.” The limited trading that has occurred is over-the-counter (OTC) in the U.S., reflecting the view of some investors that the stock is headed to zero, which is why sellers are prepared to unload at whatever price they can get. No Canadian exchange trading will take place so long as the CTO remains in effect. In addition, after revocation of the CTO, TSX Venture Exchange requirements must be met.

    Like

  12. We will be attending M-Vest’s (a division of investment banking firm Maxim Group LLC) 2024 Healthcare IT Virtual Conference on January 24 – 25, 2024. RHT.V is scheduled to appear on Day 1 at 3:00 PM (New York time).

    Like

  13. Investors will have further information regarding the delayed financial statements and Cease Trade Order, as well as details regarding the state of the business and 2024 outlook, with press releases expected in the upcoming days. While RHT.V has clearly stumbled, the news is not all bad.

    Like

  14. From both an IR and legal perspective, what are the company’s obligations with respect to updating shareholders via press release at this juncture?

    Themoneynarrative replies (4:02 PM): Legally, the company must report material change or material facts. Right now, there likely is nothing material beyond the delayed financials, which is known to the public. On the other hand, they CAN (and should) provide an investor relations update, which would provide a degree of reassurance to the market. It is surprising that this has not been done, although from a legal perspective it is not required.

    Like

  15. How long do companies typically have to report financials once a CTO put in place before being delisted? Is it possible to be delisted from the TSX for not reporting?

    Themoneynarrative replies (3:27 PM): Delisting is an exchange issue, and does not happen simply because an issuer is subject to a Cease Trade Order for late filing of financials. Typically delisting only occurs after many months owing to an issuer failing to respect listing criteria, although trading (provided that no CTO is in effect) may continue on other exchanges. Don’t be misled by parties who have little legal and investing knowledge (many posters on investor chat sites).

    Like

  16. At present CTO probably the best for retails invest in this clown show. Could some disagreement with auditor explain this mess?

    Themoneynarrative replies (8:08 AM): That is an astute observation, since a lack of information and the uncertainty that causes over time cause a stock to drift down in these scenarios. Thus, when the CTO is eventually lifted after the financials issue, investors will have had time to consider the company’s actual situation, the market reflecting sentiment based upon the facts revealed by the financials (which could send the stock in either direction). A disagreement may not be the problem; rather, the auditors may have encountered sufficient uncertainty or poorly-managed records that very extensive revision and verification is required. The company’s expanding business and applicable accounting standards may also have dictated a thorough review of information with clients, which has already been indicated. Limited resources devoted to the audit function by both the company and the auditors may also have been significant contributing factors. There are quite a number of plausible scenarios, which will be revealed in due course. The big question is to what extent the business is affected and whether future progress is impaired. On a positive note, investors will have the benefit of a top-tier accounting firm’s work and any corrective measures that have been taken, as well as the greater certainty that audited financial statements bring. Of course it is always possible that RHT.V is in a precarious situation, but that is far from certain.

    Like

  17. Although not a great sign, what is your take on this CTO effecting the operations of the company? If the operations are sound, I’m assuming this shouldn’t have an effect on the companies ability to be profitable? Just trying to determine if this is an indication the company is not doing well, aka if I’m about to lose my investment or if these types of issues are typically not linked to a companies success

    Themoneynarrative replies (10:23 PM): The CTO is a regulatory tool to “encourage” the company to file its financials. The rationale (regulatory policy) is obvious, which is that investors must be properly informed regarding the issuer, which they are not during the delinquency of filing. Delayed financials are not that uncommon, particularly for early-stage issuers. While this is true, so also is the fact that companies that are in very serious trouble tend to run into the same problem. While a CTO will always cause great consternation, it is a stretch to assume the worst. In the case of RHT.V, we have seen no signs of malfeasance (readers, this is NOT an invitation to revisit the fraud visited upon the company and upon investors several years ago). Thus, they should be able to continue building the business once they have straightened out the filing issue, provided that the company is not in dire straits owing to some as yet undisclosed factors.

    Like

  18. Now the question becomes “how long will this CTO last?”

    Themoneynarrative replies (10:08 PM): Until the delinquent financial statements are filed (1. annual audited financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2023, 2. interim financial report for the period ended September 30, 2023, 3. management’s discussion and analysis for the periods ended June 30, 2023 and September 30, 2023, 4. certification of annual and interim filings for the periods ended June 30, 2023 and September 30, 2023). Note that the CTO will only be lifted after the market has had a reasonable time to review them.

    Like

  19. Finally. Regulators should have stepped in in 2018 rather than allow the scheme to continue and more victims to be drawn in. Better late than never

    Themoneynarrative replies (9:43 PM): We disagree. The CTO imposed today (January 16, 2024) relates to the failure to file financial statements in a timely manner, and has absolutely nothing to do with prior events.

    More in particular, the CTO clarifies that:

    “The Issuer [RHT.V] has not filed the following periodic disclosure required by the Legislation:

    1. annual audited financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2023,
    2. interim financial report for the period ended September 30, 2023,
    3. management’s discussion and analysis for the periods ended June 30, 2023 and
    September 30, 2023,
    4. certification of annual and interim filings for the periods ended June 30, 2023 and
    September 30, 2023.”

    Like

Leave a comment